<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Another Blogger - Latest Comments in Deciding Who to Follow on Twitter</title><link>http://anotherblogger.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://anotherblogger.disqus.com/deciding_who_to_follow_on_twitter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:09:37 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Deciding Who to Follow on Twitter</title><link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2009/01/19/deciding-who-to-follow-on-twitter/#comment-16036592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Completely agree with you follow no follow process. The people who are there to spam, usually unfollow me within 24 hrs without a follow back. Only proving they have a agenda :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tawny Press</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:09:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deciding Who to Follow on Twitter</title><link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2009/01/19/deciding-who-to-follow-on-twitter/#comment-16036591</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well put Aaron.  I agree completely.  Too often I see newcomers to Twitter not engaging in conversation but creating a one way diatribe.  No thank you.  (Unfortunately these abusers tend to land largely inside my industry...)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">DaleChumbley</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 03:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Deciding Who to Follow on Twitter</title><link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2009/01/19/deciding-who-to-follow-on-twitter/#comment-16036590</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Good post. I hadn't really thought about it, but I use a very similar thought process when deciding who to follow.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Rob Boek</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 03:49:50 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>